“Budgetary Caps & EUA Loopholes Undermining FDA Oversight”

Strengthen the FDA

AKA “Remove administrative barriers to effective performance”




Which agency/agencies promulgated the regulation? *
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) / Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Which title, parts, and/or sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) should be rescinded? *
• 21 C.F.R. Part 312, Subpart I (Expanded Access/Emergency Use of Unapproved Drugs and Biologics). • 21 U.S.C. § 379h(c)(4) (PDUFA operating-reserve requirement mandating a 10–14 week user-fee carryover).
What is your name?
—OPTIONAL--
Is your proposed rescission a notice of proposed rulemaking, final rule, direct final rule, interim final rule, or interpretive rule? *
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
What is the name of the regulation being rescinded, if applicable? *
“Budgetary Caps & EUA Loopholes Undermining FDA Oversight”
Please provide a short summary of the justifications for the rescission. *
FDA’s capacity to hire, train, and retain critical review staff is hampered by the PDUFA operating-reserve mandate in 21 U.S.C. § 379h(c)(4), which requires a rigid year-end carryover and effectively forces hiring and procurement freezes. Meanwhile, 21 C.F.R. Part 312, Subpart I establishes a separate, expedited “emergency use” pathway that circumvents the agency’s standard safety-and-efficacy review processes. Rescinding these provisions would free FDA to deploy both appropriated and user-fee funds flexibly for full staffing and infrastructure, and ensure that any emergency access authorization meets the same transparent data and review standards as routine approvals.
Please insert the address of the agency. [NPRM, DFR, and IFR only]
Department of Health & Human Services Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993
Please insert the contact information for the agency. *
(301) 492-4305 (410) 786-1524 (410) 786-8437
What is the background for the regulation being rescinded? *
Under PDUFA (1992, reauthorized periodically), Congress created user-fee revenue to fund FDA review staff but also imposed, in 21 U.S.C. § 379h(c)(4), a statutory requirement that FDA maintain a 10–14 week operating reserve, which agencies interpret as capping carryover and triggering hiring freezes. Separately, in 2007 FDA codified emergency-use authority—first created by statute at 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3—into Part 312, Subpart I, enabling broad access to unapproved medical products without the full data transparency and multi-phase review typical of NDA/BLA pathways.
Explain the reasons for the rescission. *
Removing the PDUFA reserve requirement (§ 379h(c)(4)) allows FDA to carry forward user fees and appropriations into the next fiscal year, smoothing staffing cycles, avoiding end-of-year freezes, and supporting continuous evaluation capacity. Deleting Part 312 Subpart I ensures that any emergency access authorization follows the same minimum evidentiary and procedural safeguards as full IND and BLA reviews, reinforcing public trust and preventing loophole-driven rollouts.
Describe the text of the relevant C.F.R. provisions as it will exist after the rescission. *
— 21 U.S.C. § 379h(c)(4) would be struck, eliminating the statutory operating-reserve floor so that FDA may obligate user-fee funds in alignment with its scientific and staffing needs. — 21 C.F.R. Part 312, Subpart I would be deleted; emergency or expanded-access uses of unapproved drugs and biologics must proceed under the standard IND/BLA framework, with full safety, efficacy, and transparency requirements. All other FDA review, labeling, and post-market surveillance provisions remain in force.
Please insert the name of the current agency head. *
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Please insert the title of the agency head. *
Secretary of Health and Human Services