Permissible Interest on Loans That Are Sold, Assigned, or Otherwise Transferred (OCC/FDIC Final Rule, 2020)

Stop Federal Backing of Predatory Lending Schemes

AKA “End Federal Meddling in State Lending Laws”




Which agency/agencies promulgated the regulation? *
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Which title, parts, and/or sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) should be rescinded? *
12 CFR § 7.4001(e) (OCC) 12 CFR § 160.110(d) (OCC – for federal savings associations) 12 CFR § 331.4(e) (FDIC) These were finalized in 2020 to codify the “valid-when-made” doctrine and extend it to non-bank purchasers of loans.
What is your name?
—OPTIONAL--
Is your proposed rescission a notice of proposed rulemaking, final rule, direct final rule, interim final rule, or interpretive rule? *
Final Rule
What is the name of the regulation being rescinded, if applicable? *
Permissible Interest on Loans That Are Sold, Assigned, or Otherwise Transferred (OCC/FDIC Final Rule, 2020)
Please provide a short summary of the justifications for the rescission. *
The 2020 rule codified the "valid-when-made" doctrine, allowing any interest rate that was legal at the time a national bank issued a loan to remain valid even after that loan is sold—regardless of the buyer. This enables “rent-a-bank” schemes, where non-bank lenders use national banks to evade state usury caps, then buy back the high-interest loans. The rule facilitates predatory lending, consolidates market power among fintech platforms and private equity lenders, and strips states of their historical authority to regulate loan terms.
Please insert the address of the agency. [NPRM, DFR, and IFR only]
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency 400 7th Street SW, Washington, DC 20219 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20429
Please insert the contact information for the agency. *
OCC: (202) 649-6800 · publicaffairs@occ.treas.gov FDIC: (877) 275-3342 · webmaster@fdic.gov
What is the background for the regulation being rescinded? *
Historically, national banks could export interest rates from their charter state, but only so long as the bank held the loan. Courts and regulators recognized that once a non-bank entity purchased the loan, state laws applied. In 2015, the Madden v. Midland ruling reaffirmed that principle. The 2020 OCC and FDIC rules overturned that precedent by codifying the “valid-when-made” doctrine, allowing loan buyers to preserve high rates indefinitely—undermining state-level consumer protections and enabling a surge in exploitative fintech lending models.
Explain the reasons for the rescission. *
This rule invites abuse. Predatory lenders use national banks as pass-throughs, creating a two-tier system: one where banks enjoy full federal preemption, and one where non-banks, via loopholes, get the same privileges without the same oversight. The rule accelerates consolidation in the small loan market, empowers private equity rollups of lending platforms, and strips states of their long-standing authority to cap interest rates. Rescinding it would restore balance, empower state enforcement, and limit monopolistic rent extraction from financially vulnerable populations.
Describe the text of the relevant C.F.R. provisions as it will exist after the rescission. *
12 CFR § 7.4001(e), § 160.110(d), and § 331.4(e) would be deleted in full. OCC and FDIC regulations would no longer extend interest rate preemption beyond the originating national bank. State usury laws would again apply to loans once they are sold to non-bank entities, consistent with historical precedent and the Madden v. Midland ruling.
Please insert the name of the current agency head. *
Rodney E Hood
Please insert the title of the agency head. *
Acting Comptroller of the Currency