Premerger Notification: Certain Exempt Transactions and Filing Requirements

Stop Private Equity from Gaming Antitrust Laws

AKA “Stop Hidden Mergers That Hurt Small Businesses”




Which agency/agencies promulgated the regulation? *
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Which title, parts, and/or sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) should be rescinded? *
16 CFR § 803.20(b) — specifically the portions that exempt certain acquisitions from premerger notification under the Hart–Scott–Rodino Act, including intra-person transactions and secondary acquisitions in vertical mergers.
What is your name?
—OPTIONAL--
Is your proposed rescission a notice of proposed rulemaking, final rule, direct final rule, interim final rule, or interpretive rule? *
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
What is the name of the regulation being rescinded, if applicable? *
Premerger Notification: Certain Exempt Transactions and Filing Requirements
Please provide a short summary of the justifications for the rescission. *
This rule exempts certain vertical and intra-corporate acquisitions from antitrust review under Hart–Scott–Rodino (HSR) thresholds. It allows large firms—especially private equity rollups—to consolidate supply chains without triggering public disclosure or FTC scrutiny. Rescinding these carveouts would help regulators detect anti-competitive vertical mergers before they reshape markets.
Please insert the address of the agency. [NPRM, DFR, and IFR only]
Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20580
Please insert the contact information for the agency. *
Office of Policy Planning Phone: (202) 326-2045 Email: antitrust@ftc.gov
What is the background for the regulation being rescinded? *
Under the Hart–Scott–Rodino Act (15 U.S.C. § 18a), companies must notify the FTC and DOJ of certain large mergers or acquisitions. However, 16 CFR § 803.20(b) grants exemptions for intra-person transactions and certain vertical or secondary acquisitions. These carveouts were justified as “low-risk” or “internal restructurings,” but in practice, they now shield aggressive consolidation strategies—particularly in healthcare, data platforms, and agriculture—from public view and regulatory intervention.
Explain the reasons for the rescission. *
The safe harbor provision in § 803.20(b) allows acquirers to build vertically integrated empires piece by piece, with each acquisition below the HSR filing threshold or considered “internal.” As a result, the FTC can’t see the full picture of consolidation until it’s too late. Private equity firms exploit this rule to dominate regional hospital chains, veterinary practices, farm inputs, and more. Rescinding this provision would close a major loophole in merger oversight and support more comprehensive antitrust enforcement.
Describe the text of the relevant C.F.R. provisions as it will exist after the rescission. *
16 CFR § 803.20(b) would be revised to remove exemptions for: • Acquisitions between commonly controlled entities (intra-person transactions) • Secondary acquisitions where the primary interest is below HSR thresholds • Vertical or adjacent-market transactions previously deemed low-risk After rescission, parties would be required to file premerger notifications for any acquisition where consolidation may materially impact vertical competition, even if technically internal or layered through subsidiaries.
Please insert the name of the current agency head. *
Andrew Ferguson
Please insert the title of the agency head. *
Chair, Federal Trade Commission