End Gerrymandering. Restore Oversight.
AKA “Promote Uniform Redistricting Integrity Across States”
Which agency/agencies promulgated the regulation? *
U.S. Department of Justice – Civil Rights Division
Rescind the DOJ’s current non-enforcement stance on redistricting fairness following Rucho v. Common Cause.
—OPTIONAL--
Interpretive Rule
Post-Rucho federal policy permitting states to redistrict without fairness, competitiveness, or civil rights review.
Without federal oversight, state legislatures engage in extreme partisan gerrymandering that entrenches incumbents, reduces competitiveness, and suppresses the representational power of young, minority, and urban voters.
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division – Voting Section
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Andrew Braniff, Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General
(202) 514-3831
EMP.Lit@crt.usdoj.gov
Following Rucho v. Common Cause (2019), the Supreme Court declared partisan gerrymandering a political issue outside the jurisdiction of federal courts. This ruling, combined with the loss of preclearance in Shelby County v. Holder, has left redistricting maps almost entirely unchecked. The DOJ has not filled the resulting enforcement vacuum.
Rescinding DOJ’s passive posture would allow the agency to reassert its enforcement authority under the Voting Rights Act and civil rights mandates. Federal review of redistricting maps should assess fairness, competitiveness, and racial impact—regardless of whether partisan intent is overtly stated.
Redistricting procedures affecting federal elections shall be subject to DOJ review under the VRA. States must demonstrate that maps meet standards for population balance, compactness, and nonpartisan criteria. Jurisdictions enacting major changes must submit plans for federal review and approval.
Kristen Clarke
Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights