“Federal Legislator Age-Limit Amendment”

← Back to Category — Democratic Reform

Age Cutoff Limits for Congress

AKA “Congressional Leadership Renewal Act”


Which agency/agencies promulgated the regulation? *
• U.S. Congress (via the U.S. Constitution’s Article I, §§ 2 & 3)
Which title, parts, and/or sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) should be rescinded? *
• Article I, § 2 – add an upper-age limit for Representatives. • Article I, § 3 – add an upper-age limit for Senators.
What is your name?
—OPTIONAL--
Is your proposed rescission a notice of proposed rulemaking, final rule, direct final rule, interim final rule, or interpretive rule? *
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
What is the name of the regulation being rescinded, if applicable? *
“Federal Legislator Age-Limit Amendment”
Please provide a short summary of the justifications for the rescission. *
The Constitution currently sets only minimum age requirements (25 for Representatives, 30 for Senators) with no maximum. Imposing a uniform upper-age cap (e.g. 75 years) promotes generational turnover, helps guard against age-related decline in capacity, and ensures our legislature remains responsive to evolving national challenges.
Please insert the address of the agency. [NPRM, DFR, and IFR only]
U.S. House Judiciary Committee 2138 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee 226 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510
Please insert the contact information for the agency. *
(202) 224-5225
What is the background for the regulation being rescinded? *
Since 1789, Article I has prescribed only minimum ages for Members. No constitutional text limits how long or how old a Representative or Senator may serve. By contrast, many democracies cap legislative service or impose retirement ages to safeguard institutional agility and representative diversity.
Explain the reasons for the rescission. *
• Article I, § 2: Amending to set an upper age (e.g. 75) ensures House Members maintain the vigor and connections needed to serve a 21st-century electorate. • Article I, § 3: Mirroring in the Senate clause balances the two chambers and fosters leadership renewal. These changes preserve the benefits of experience while mandating timely transitions to new leadership.
Describe the text of the relevant C.F.R. provisions as it will exist after the rescission. *
— Article I, § 2 (Representative qualifications) amended to read: “No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained the age of twenty-five Years, nor more than seventy-five Years, at the time of election…” — Article I, § 3 (Senator qualifications) amended to read: “No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained the age of thirty Years, nor more than seventy-five Years, at the time of election…” All other constitutional qualifications and procedures remain unchanged.
Please insert the name of the current agency head. *
Jim Jordan, Chuck Grassley
Please insert the title of the agency head. *
Chair, U.S. House Judiciary Committee; • Title: Chair

← Back to Category — Democratic Reform