← Back to Category — Civil Liberties & Bodily Autonomy
End "Wartime" Deportation Powers
AKA “Restoring Constitutional Balance in National Security Protocols”
Which agency/agencies promulgated the regulation? *
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
Rescind 8 C.F.R. § 215.2 and any other regulatory provisions that rely on 8 U.S.C. §§ 21–24 (Alien Enemies Act)
—OPTIONAL--
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
8 C.F.R. § 215.2 – Suspension of departure of certain aliens
Rescind executive authority under 8 U.S.C. § 21–24 (Alien Enemies Act) enabling
indefinite detention or surveillance of non-citizens based solely on nationality during
declared hostilities. This provision violates modern principles of due process and
equal protection, and its continued existence threatens constitutional integrity and
civil liberties.
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Andrew Braniff, Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights
Division, Department of Justice, (202) 514-3831, EMP.Lit@crt.usdoj.gov.
Originally passed in 1798 as part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Alien Enemies
Act has been used during wartime to enable the arrest, internment, and removal of
non-citizens from countries deemed hostile—even in the absence of individualized
suspicion or criminal conduct. While other Alien and Sedition statutes have been
repealed, this one remains, enshrining collective punishment into U.S. law. It was
notably used to justify the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII, a
practice now widely acknowledged as unjust.
The Alien Enemies Act facilitates collective punishment by nationality. Regulatory rescission of its implementing provisions aligns federal enforcement with due process, protects civil liberties, and prevents abuse of power in future conflicts.
8 C.F.R. § 215.2 and related provisions authorizing action under the Alien Enemies Act shall be repealed. No regulation may authorize detention, surveillance, or movement restrictions based solely on citizenship or presumed allegiance in the absence of individualized due process.
Pam Bondi
Attorney General, US Department of Justice